![]() It's not to say the scores aren't impressive and all, but it's clear you're being a bit disingenuous here. It doesn't even eclipse the 3970X, and the 3990X is further above that. It will be exciting to finally see what the M1 Ultra can do in real-world scenarios once the chip arrives in the new Mac Studio coming on March 18th.Īdmin said:A new Geekbench 5 result shows Apple's new M1 Ultra flagship going toe-to-toe with AMD's monster 64 core Threadripper 3990X, while consuming just a fifth of the power.įirst Apple M1 Ultra Benchmark Posted, Nearly Matches Threadripper 3990X : Read more More importantly, Geekbench 5 results don't always line up with real-world performance, so we still need to take these results with a few doses of salt. While these numbers are very impressive, this is just one benchmark. However, Intel is the only winner in this scenario, with both AMD's 3990X and 5950X losing out to the M1 Ultra, by 47.8% and 6.3% respectively. The x86 CPUs do claw their way back in the single-threaded results, with the Core i9-12900K outperforming the M1 Ultra by 11.4%. AMD's Ryzen 9 5950X also suffered the same fate, with an even greater 45% loss. Of course, it's no surprise that Intel's 16 core i9-12900K was also decimated in the process, showing a 40% loss compared to the M1 Ultra. That would make the M1 Ultra 4.7x more efficient compared to the power-hungry 3990X with its 280W TDP. This is incredible considering the M1 Ultra only has 20 cores, with an advertised power consumption of just 60 watts according to Apple. For perspective, AMD's Threadripper 3990X with 64 Zen 2 cores is just 4.5% faster, coming in with 25,133 points. The multi-threaded score for this particular Geekbench 5 run came in at 24,055 points. You should also check out the first MacBook Air and iPad Pro benchmark scores.The M1 Ultra's performance is without a doubt very impressive. While the Mac Pro has faster GPUs, meaning it still beats the new mini in terms of GPU-accelerated tasks, like video editing, no Macs beat the mini’s footprint, silent operation and price. While much of the speed gains provided by the new mini stem from the fact that it wasn’t upgraded for a bunch of years, this is currently without a doubt the best Mac model in terms of value.įor just $1,099 for the “pro” edition, the new Mac mini is a much better value than the base $1,199 model of the new MacBook Air which scored 4,091 and 7,693 in single-core and multi-core performance, respectively.Īnd with a $200 CPU upgrade, it offers more CPU power than the aging Mac Pro. Apple has underscored that the updated Mac mini does not use the slower, less powerful mobile editions of the Intel CPU and graphics.įor Mac mini fans out there, this is all just wonderful news. As I said, additional benchmarks and side-by-side real-world testing would be needed to make any definite conclusions.īy comparison, the 2018 MacBook Pro models range from 4,505 to 5,344 in single-core performance and about 8,831 to 22,556 in multi-core, depending on configuration. ![]() “But if the numbers were averaged together, the new Mac mini would be closer in performance to a high-end laptop than a powerful desktop,” he said. The author speculates the discrepancy could be due to some other process running at the same time as the first test. A second benchmark posted just a few minutes earlier shows a single-core score of 5,070 and a multi-core score of 16,818. Take these scores with a grain of salt: we need more benchmarks before claiming that the new mini is faster than the mid-range Mac Pro. In other words, the latest Mac mini offers the same CPU performance as the more than three times expensive Mac Pro which, by the way, does not offer DIY upgrades like the new mini does. Apple’s higher-end 12-core Mac Pro and four separate configurations of the iMac Pro all easily outperform the Mac mini, albeit at much higher prices.īy comparison, the 2013 Mac Pro starts at $3,799. The first Geekbench result is the strongest, showing a single-core score of 5,512 which eclipses all Mac models save for the latest four-core 4.2GHz iMac, plus a multi-core score of 23,516 placing the Mac mini at the same general performance level as a mid-range configuration of the Intel Xeon-based Mac Pro, which runs eight cores at 3.0GHz. Apple’s Mac mini was refreshed last week and it’s quite a beast, according to the first Geekbench 4 synthetic benchmark scores pertaining to the pricier $1,099 model upgraded to an optional six-core 3.2GHz Intel Core i7 processor, resulting in a $1,299 configuration.Īccording to VentureBeat, which first spotted the new Geekbench CPU scores for a “Macmini8,1” model featuring an Intel Core i7-8700B CPU running at 3.2GHz with six cores.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |